This website offers a number of intervention strategies. It was developed as a service learning project of the course, Psychological Assessment and Intervention I (CEP 886) at the Michigan State University in 2002.
"Reconciling Reading (Rathvon, 1999). This intervention, which is based on Schema Theory, engages students in enrichment activities prior to reading the passage. In this way, students have the opportunity to activate and enhance existing knowledge before reading. Pre-teaching vocabulary words will enhance comprehension.
-
Start by the last section in the reading lesson, often called "Enrichment Activities". Conduct several of these activities to build background information and vocabulary.
-
Teach the skill lessons in the teacher's manual in the context of the story rather than with isolated sentences or paragraphs.
-
Ask the students questions about the reading in order to help them make predictions about the content or outcome of the story.
-
Have the students read the story silently to apply background knowledge and skills on their own.
-
After the reading, conduct a brief discussion to evaluate the lesson's four instructional goals:
-
Building story background to enhance comprehension;
-
Teaching specific vocabulary;
-
Teaching reading subskills, such as predicting outcomes;
-
Focusing attention on relevant story information.
Compare the students' scores on daily vocabulary or comprehension skill sheets or end-of-unit reading tests before and after implementation of this intervention."
[Source: Baker, J.A. (2002). Resources and supports for teachers. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.]
Jim Wright, author and creator of Intervention Central provides a rich and valuable source of free intervention strategies for use in K-12 classrooms. The reading comprehension kit is a compendium of techniques and strategies aimed at developing students' skills to understand a reading text.
"Encouraging Use of Text Enhancements (Hedin & Conderman, 2010). Text enhancements can be used to tag important vocabulary terms, key ideas, or other reading content. If working with photocopied material, the student can use a highlighter--but should limit highlighting to important text elements such as main idea and key vocabulary terms. Another enhancement strategy is the ‘lasso and rope’ technique—using a pen or pencil to circle a vocabulary term and then drawing a line that connects that term to its underlined definition. If working from a textbook, the student can cut sticky notes into strips. These strips can be inserted in the book as pointers to text of interest. They can also be used as temporary labels—e.g., for writing a vocabulary term and its definition."
[Source: Wright, J. (2013).Reading Comprehension Fix-Up Skills: A Classroom Toolkit. In Intervention Central. Retrieved September 1, 2013 from http://www.interventioncentral.org/response-to-intervention].
Reading comprehension is a complex intellectual process involving many skills. Reading experts argue that reading comprehension is primarily a matter of vocabulary knowledge and reasoning, rather than a long series of component sub-skills. As there are various levels in the hierarchy of thinking, so are there various levels of comprehension. Higher levels of comprehension include higher levels of thinking. Dechant & Smith (1977) lists the following subskills of comprehension:
-
Associate experience and meaning with the graphic symbol;
-
React to the sensory images (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, taste, smell) suggested by words;
-
Interpret verbal connotations and denotations;
-
Understand words in context and selection of meaning that fits the context;
-
Give meaning to units of increasing size: the phrase, clause, sentence; detection and understanding the main ideas;
-
Detect and understand the main ideas;
-
Recognize significant details;
-
Interpret the organization;
-
Answer questions about a printed passage;
-
Follow directions;
-
Perceive relationships: part-whole; cause-effect; general-specific; place, sequence, size and time;
-
Interpret figurative expressions;
-
Make inferences and draw conclusions;
-
Supply implied details and evaluate what is read;
-
Identify and evaluate character traits, reactions and motives;
-
Anticipate outcomes;
-
Recognize and understand the writer’s purpose;
-
Recognize literacy and semantic devices and identify the tone, mood, and intent or purpose of the writer;
-
Determine whether the text affirms, denies, or fails to express an opinion about a supposed fact or condition;
-
Identify the antecedents of such words as who, some, or, they;
-
Retain ideas;
-
Apply ideas and integrate them with one’s past experience.
It is however emphasized that the learning of separate sub-skills is not a prerequisite for learning to read. John Downing (1986, 2000) defines reading as a skill. A skill is a complex set of processes - cognitive, attitudinal and manipulative - a total performance. This view is supported by Kenneth Goodman (in Harris & Sipay, 1972) who argues that reading is a holistic process. “There is no possible sequencing of skills in reading instruction, since all systems must be used independently in the reading process even in the first attempts at learning to read” (p. 56). Downing and Goodman emphasize that the key point of every skill is the integration of complex set of behaviors that make the total pattern. This view of reading as unitary skill or holistic process can be expressed in the following equation:
Reading = Skills1 + Skills2 + Skills3 + Skillsn (Hermosa, 1996).
Interventions should therefore treat individual materials as independent strategies leading to the development of reading comprehension. For example, being able to identify the sequence of events in a reading passage is an independent comprehension skill. However, said skill is supported by a knowledge of subject-verb agreement; and a number of basic grammar and writing rules. A successful reading comprehension intervention is based on the proper determination of difficulties in a comprehension subskill and the appropriate integration of all the subskills into the reading process.
[Source: Pe, R. (2005). The correlation between early reading exposure and the reading performance of college freshmen (Unpublished Thesis). University of the Cordilleras, Baguio City, Philippines.]
"Teaching reading comprehension to struggling and at-risk readers today is different from the past. Teachers need to focus on extensive comprehension instruction with all students, not just successful readers. This article discusses the causes of reading comprehension difficulties in struggling and at-risk readers. It also reviews multiple strategies that have proved to be successful in a second grade classroom in a Title 1, At-Risk school, as well as strategies used and found to be successful by other surveyed teachers. As new best practices in reading comprehension instruction are developed and researched, teaching strategies need to evolve as well."
[Source: Closs, E.K. (Undated). Teaching reading comprehension to struggling and at-risk readers: strategies that work. Retrieved 9/3/13 from http://www.readinglady.com/mosaic/tools/TeachingReadingComprehensiontoStrugglingReaders-MastersThesisbyEllen.pdf]
Reading Comprehension Interventions
Disclaimer: The following links lead to reading comprehension strategies NOT owned and maintained by the admin @Assessments for Exceptional Children. Suggested websites are provided for educational purposes.